Tel 电话: 1300 038 861
Email 电邮: firstname.lastname@example.org
Address 地址: 1402/227 Elizabeth St, Sydney NSW 2000
Australian Credit License: 501 182
This article originally appeared in Australian Broker
The Australian Senate will this week debate some of the most significant reforms to the rules that govern lending in Australia, after the Senate Economics Legislation Committee recommended changes to the National Consumer Credit Protection (NCCP) Act.
The Committee, which has a majority of Coalition members, voted along party lines to recommend the reforms, which represent some of the biggest changes to the lender/borrower relationship since regulations were tightened in the wake of the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in the late 2000s. Labor and Green Senators on the Committee voted against and issued dissenting statements.
The reform will likely be put to a vote this week. Should the party lines hold, it will come down to Crossbench votes in the Senate to decide if it passes.
At the crux of the issue are the responsible lending obligations. Currently, the onus is on lenders to vet borrowers for their suitability, a move that was brought in after the wave of defaults that precipitated the GFC.
Should the reforms be passed, it would see the emphasis shift in favour of the lenders, who would now be able to take borrowers at face value based on the information that they supply, without further investigation required.
The new reforms have been proposed in an attempt to help credit flow more freely through the economy and allow for lending to help lift Australia out of the COVID-19 induced slump. They would also shift the burden of consumer protection away from banks and onto regulators such as AFCA.
Recommendation 1.1 of the Hayne Royal Commission into the banking sector explicitly warned against amendments to the NCCP Act and put the job of addressing suitability to receive a loan onto the lender, something which the Greens mentioned in their statement of dissent.
Furthermore, the Australasian Consumer Law Roundtable, a group of legal scholars, published an article today that was based on a submission made to the Committee in February.
“Even after Hayne, banks are continuing to fight their obligations and have yet to show they have changed their ways,” it said.
“Consumer protection in the field of finance is important – it contributes to strengthening financial stability. The abusive, predatory and irresponsible lending practices that led to the US subprime mortgage crisis make this clear. The government’s suggestion that it is fair for borrowers to take responsibility for their own circumstances doesn’t hold water.”
“No matter how diligent their inquiries, consumers frequently lack the expertise to understand their circumstances and what financial products will be best for them. For many, almost all of the expertise lies with the banks. “
The Senate majority group said that it was “concerned by evidence that the regulatory framework has resulted in consumers being unable to access credit in a timely manner to buy their first home or to obtain a grant under the HomeBuilder scheme.”
With home loans and property prices soaring, record levels of borrowing have taken place since the lockdowns of last year, with low interest rates and high consumer confidence fuelling a boom.
Should the reforms be passed, the flow of credit would increase yet further and, theoretically, continue the ongoing growth in house prices as a barrier would be removed that currently keeps a subsection of consumers out of the market.
Industry figures have spoken out in favour of the changes. “This reform means less time and paperwork for borrowers, not less scrutiny for lenders,” said Anna Bligh, CEO of the Australian Banking Association. “It means less reliance on obscure discretionary spending during the loan assessment and more attention on the factors that count, like income expenses and debt.
“Banks know from decades of experience that Australians are reliable and responsible borrowers. They adjust their lifestyle to repay their loans, and when things go wrong it is rarely, if ever, due to spending habits but more to major life events that impact income, such as job loss, illness or divorce. That’s why this change makes sense.”
All visitors to this website, without exception, are invited to read and act upon the contents of this website in accordance with the following terms and conditions:
The company recognises the Office of the Australian Information Commissioner’s concerns that websites be easy to read, accessible and transparent, include appropriate privacy information and provide directions as to where to obtain further information. Confusing and irrelevant content is to be avoided.
The company recognises Clause 4.2 of the Credit Reporting Privacy Code , which provides an approved opportunity for credit provider and/or lessor disclosures of information, collected by way of a website and required under Sub- sections 21C(1) and (3)(a) of the Privacy Act 1988 as amended, to a credit reporting body. This for the various uses and attracting the various rights for the consumer and/or lessee, in accordance with Clause 4.1 (a) to (f) of the Credit Reporting Privacy Code.
These disclosures are included in the company’s Credit Information (Privacy) Management Policy (Tab 8), which is on the company’s website and the communications information content is listed in the Company’s Credit Reporting Data Management Policy (Tab 10) .
From time to time, the company’s website may facilitate consumers completing credit and/or lease applications, questionnaires, forms and the like.
The company only collects information from potential and actual consumers which is reasonably necessary, directly or indirectly, for the conduct of the company’s credit provision activities.
If the consumer suspend s or save s any online application, form, questionnaire or the like, the information the consumer has entered prior to that suspension and/or saving will be available to and retained by the company, as well as being available for the consumer to retrieve when the consumer resumes completing the online application or other activity. The company’s Credit Information (Privacy) Management Policy also applies to this information.
The company does not ask for, store, use or disclose sensitive information.
From time to time, the company’s website may contain links to the websites of third party entities. If as consumer has accessed such a third party website, via the company ‘s website, the consumer may have provided information to that third party entity. If they have chosen to provide information, access to that information may also be provided to the company by that thir d party entity, subject to an agreement between the two companies to share the information.
When viewing the company’s website, or the third party company’s website, from time to time “cookies” and “web beacons” may be used to collect information. This information may include information concerning any or all of the following:
In accordance with the company’s Credit Information (Privacy) Management Policy, the company takes reasonable steps to keep the information obtained secure and to store, use and disclose such information only in accordance with that policy. This includes the above listed information and any information included on completed and submitted applications, forms, questionnaires and the like.
The above listed information will not be used for any third party company marketing, but the company may use the information to advise the consumer of continuing and new products and services, from time to time.
The above listed information is not provided to overseas based companies for any purpose other than possible storage and review of information, for the company’s purposes only.
The above listed information may be used to assist the company in providing the consumer with any service or product, at the time of a particular visit to the company’s website or thereafter, which may or may not be the service or product that initially prompted the consumer to visit the website .
From the Privacy Commissioner’s investigation reports, the company notes that website security is an ongoing obligation and that Australian Privacy Principle 11 applies to website security management . The Office of Australian Information Commissioner’s statement, on 6 March 2014, has been noted by the company, in that the company’s policy is to continue to take reasonable steps to protect information held in digital storage.
To that end, the company utilises ICT security measures relevant to the need to protect all Internet interactions. Security steps used by the company can include:
While the company recognises that it may not be liable when a third party intentionally exploits the company’s reasonable security measures and gains unauthorised access, the company’s defence must be able to demonstrate that previous reasonable steps had been undertaken to prevent such a cyber attack.
The company’s policy is to review /update information security measures each day and to maintain information security measures that respond to the changing landscape.